First

Errata

Revised

Collected Works

p3, ¶2, ln1

In the last analysis these very . . .

 

p3, ¶2, ln1

[same as First Ed.]

p4, ¶3, ln1

In the final analysis, these very . . .

p3, ¶2&¶3

 

p3, ¶2&¶3

p5, ¶1, ln3

[¶2&¶3 in the First and Rev. Ed. are combined]

p3, ¶2, ln14

 . . . which is not problematic but simply gives expression . . .

 

p3, ¶2, ln13

 . . .  which simply gives expression  . . .

p5, ¶1, ln1

[same as First Ed.]

p3, ¶3, ln1

For if all philosophical currents . . .

 

 

p3, ¶3, ln1

If all philosophical currents . . .

 

p5, ¶1, ln3

[same as First Ed.]

p3, ¶3, ln7

 . . . philosophical trends, which are fundamentally opposed to each other, usually . . .

 

p3, ¶3, ln7

 . . . philosophical trends which are fundamentally opposed to each other usually . . .

p5, ¶1, ln7

[same as First Ed.]

p4, ¶1, ln3

 . . . positivism we seek to establish criteria

 

p4, ¶1, ln3

 . . . positivism and linguistic analysis, we seek to establish criteria  . . .

p5, ¶1, ln14

[same as First Ed., with the addition of a comma after “positivism”]

p5, ¶2, ln8

“Edward Hesserl”

Page 5 (1. 23)

“Edward Husserl”

p5, ¶2, ln8

“Edmund Husserl”

p6, ¶3, ln6

[same as Rev. Ed.]

p6, ¶3, ln11

 . . . displays a great diversity of fundamental aspects . . .

 

p6, ¶3, ln11

 . . . displays a great diversity of fundamental modal aspects . . .

p7, ¶1, ln8

[same as First Ed.]

p8, ¶2, ln6

 . . . group them in a logical concept . . .

 

p8, ¶2, ln6

...grasp them in a logical concept . . .

p8, ¶3, ln4

[same as First Ed.]

p8, ¶2, ln9

 . . . of number? of space? of organic life? of history?...

 

p8, ¶2, ln9

 . . . of number? of space? of organic life? of cultural history?...

p8, ¶3, ln7

[same as First Ed.]

p9, ¶1, ln10

This is the reason that this modal structure displays . . .

 

p9, ¶1, ln10

This is why this modal structure displays . . .

p9, ¶1, ln13

[same as First Ed.]

p10, ¶1, ln4

Fühler

Page 10 (1. 4)

Fühlen

p10, ¶1, ln4

[same as Errata]

p9, ¶3, ln4

[same as First Ed.]

p10, ¶2, ln7

 . . . for logical coherence, cultural feeling . . .

 

p10, ¶2, ln7

 . . . for logical coherence, historico-cultural feeling . . .

p10, ¶2, ln5

[same as First Ed.]

p10, ¶2, ln8

legal feeling”

 

p10, ¶2, ln8

jural feeling”

p10, ¶2, ln6

[same as First Ed.]

p26, ¶1, ln2

“attitudes”

Page 26 (1. 2)

“attitude”

p26, ¶1, ln2

[same as Errata]

p19, ¶1, ln7

[same as First Ed.]

p27, ¶3

 

Pages 27-28

Delete paragraph starting “If this state . . . .” This paragraph should be inserted on page 62 between the first and second paragraph. [sic]

p27, ¶3

[moved as indicated by errata]

p21, ¶2, ln3

[paragraph left in original location and wording revised (see essay text)]

p33, ¶2, ln7

 . . .  and to its divine origin.

 

p33, ¶1, ln2

 . . .  and to its temporal world.

p25, ¶2, ln5

[same as First Ed.]

p33, ¶2, ln9

 . . . the only three central relations in which the ego can manifest itself.”

 

 

p33, ¶1, ln4

 . . . the three central relations in which the ego can only manifest itself.”

 

p25, ¶2, ln6

[same as First Ed.]

p33, ¶3, ln11

 . . .  towards the Absolute.

 

p33, ¶2, ln11

 . . . towards the Absolute which even in its idolatry it seeks to preserve.

p25, ¶3, ln8

[same as First Ed.]

p36, ¶3, ln16 

“in principles”

Page 36 (1. 22)

“in principle”

p36, ¶1, ln13

[same as Errata]

p27, ¶3, ln14

[same as First Ed.]

p36, ¶3, ln19

“origin”

 

p36, ¶1, ln16

“Origin”

p27, ¶3, ln17

[same as First Ed.]

p41, ¶3, ln4

“form”

 

p41, ¶1, ln1

“forms”

p30, ¶2, ln3

[same as First Ed.]

p41, ¶3, ln17

“physics”

Page 41 (1. 24)

“physis.”

p41, ¶1, ln14

[same as Errata]

p30, ¶2, ln13

[same as Rev. Ed.]

p47, ¶2, ln6 

This so-called . . .

Page 47 (1. 14)

The so-called . . .

p47, ¶1, ln4

[same as Errata]

p34, ¶1, ln1

[same as First Ed.]

p55, ¶2, ln15

 . . . in which each of them was supposed . . .

 

p55, ¶1, ln13

 . . . in which each of them, according to its adherents, was supposed . . .

P.39, ¶1, ln2

[same as First Ed.]

p57, ¶2, ln5

“mode”

Page 57 (1. 10)

“modes”

p56, ¶4, ln5

[same as Errata]

p39, ¶5, ln4

[same as Rev. Ed.]

p58, ¶1, ln1

“ever”

Page 58 (1. 1)

“even”

p57, ¶2, ln13

[same as Errata]

p40, ¶1, ln9

[same as Rev. Ed.]

p62

 

 

p61, ¶2

[“missing” paragraph inserted after ¶1 (see note on First Ed., p27)]

p45, ¶1, ln8

[paragraph not inserted, and ¶1 and 2 combined ]

p62, ¶2, ln4

“historistic”

 

p62, ¶1, ln3

“historicistic”

p45, ¶1, ln10

“historicist”

p62, ¶3, ln3

“aspects of the human experiential.”

Page 62 (1. 19)

Add “horizon” after “aspects of the human experiential.”

p62, ¶2, ln3

[same as Errata]

p45, ¶2, ln3

[same as Rev. Ed.]

p62, ¶3, ln4

“ego of”

Page 62 (1. 20)

“ego or”

p62, ¶2, ln4-5

[same as Errata]

p45, ¶2, ln4

[same as Rev. Ed.]

p64, ¶1, ln5

Even Toynbees’s . . .

 

p63, ¶1, ln15

Toynbees’s . . .

p46, ¶2, ln14

[same as Rev. Ed.]

p64, ¶1, ln10

 . . . of true Christendom.

 

p63, ¶1, ln20

 . . . of true Christendom in a non-dogmatic, syncretist sense.

p46, ¶2, ln18

[same as First Ed.]

 

 

p64, ¶2, ln3

But it originated in the first half of the last century . . .

 

p63, ¶2, ln3

It originated in the first decenaries of the last century . . .

p46, ¶3, ln2

It originated in the first half of the last century . . .

p64, ¶2, ln5

From an idealistic philosophy, the latter opposed . . .

 

p63, ¶2, ln5

Many leading thinkers of that period opposed . . .

p46, ¶3, ln3

With an idealistic philosophy, it placed the historical mode of thought in opposition to . . .

 

p64, ¶2, ln11

. . . from the 18th century.

 

p64, ¶1, ln2

 . . . from the first decennaries of the 18th century.

p46, ¶3, ln8

[same as First Ed.]

p64, ¶2, ln13

“mode”

 

p64, ¶1, ln5

 “model”

p46, ¶3, ln10

[same as Rev. Ed.]

p64, ¶2, ln16

 . . . the anti-historical picture of . . .

 

p64, ¶1, ln8

. . . the anti-historical world-picture of . . .

p47, ¶1, ln1

[same as Rev. Ed.]

p67, ¶2, ln4 

Copora

Page 67 (1. 20)

Corpore

p66, ¶3, ln4

[same as Errata]

p48, ¶3, ln3

[same as Rev. Ed.]

p68, ¶1, ln11

 . . . should be considered as if . . .

 

p67, ¶2, ln13

 . . . should be considered philosophically as if . . .

p48, ¶3, ln20

[same as Rev. Ed.]

p69, ¶1, ln15

 . . . called for the great Geometer.

 

p68, ¶3, ln15

 . . . called God the great Geometer.

p49, ¶2, ln11

[same as Rev. Ed.]

p71, ¶2, ln6

 . . . in the . . .

 

p70, ¶3, ln6

 . . . and in the . . .

p50, ¶2, ln5

[same as Rev. Ed.]

p72, ¶2, ln18

 . . . . elements, namely, the abstract human individuals, in their presumed natural freedom and equality, in a mathematical way.

Page 72 (1. 29)

Delete “in a mathematical way.”

p72, ¶1, ln6

[same as Errata]

p51, ¶2, ln13

 [same as Rev. Ed. except:]

. . . elements (namely, the abstract human individuals, in their presumed natural freedom and equality).

p73, ¶1, ln4

 . . . nomos, i.e., the ethical law, which . . .  

 

p72, ¶2, ln7

 . . . nomos, i.e., the ethical law (categorical imperative), which . . .

p51, ¶3, ln5

. . . nomos (i.e., the ethical law or categorical imperative), which . . .

p74, ¶2, ln23

“rational”

 

 

p74, ¶1, ln11

“national”

 

p52, ¶2, ln17

[same as Rev. Ed.]

p76, ¶2, ln5

 . . . mechanistic mode . . .

 

p75, ¶2, ln5

 . . . mechanistic thought mode . . .  

p53, ¶3, ln4

[same as First Ed.]

p76, ¶2, ln6

“modal”

Page 76 (1. 18)

“model”

p75, ¶2, ln6 

[same as Errata]

p53, ¶3, ln4

[same as Rev. Ed.]

p78, ¶2, ln1

“Historicist”

 

p77, ¶3, ln1

“historicist”

p54, ¶3, ln1

[same as Rev. Ed.]

p80, ¶2, ln6 

“an autonomy”

Page 80 (1.19)

“and autonomy”

p79, ¶3, ln6 

[same as Errata]

p56, ¶2, ln4

[same as Rev. Ed.]

p80, ¶2, ln12

 . . . really external value.

 

p80, ¶1, ln5

 . . . really eternal value.

p56, ¶2, ln9

[same as Rev. Ed.]

p82, ¶2, ln7

The rationalistic trend in the footsteps . . .

 

p81, ¶3, ln7

The rationalistic trend, in the footsteps . . .

p57, ¶2, ln11

[same as Rev. Ed.]

p83, ¶1, ln3

“historistic”

 

p83, ¶1, ln3

“historicistic”

p59, ¶1, ln3

“historicist”

p84, ¶4, ln5

For here we do not . . .

 

p84, ¶4, ln5

Here we do not . . .

p60, ¶2, ln4

In that situation we do not . . .

p84, ¶4, ln6

 . . . historical mode, or on the historical aspect of our experience . . .

 

p84, ¶4, ln6

 . . . historical mode of our experience . . .

p60, ¶2, ln5

 . . . historical mode, or aspect, of our experience . . .

p85, ¶2, ln5

We are, then much rather, interested in . . .

 

p85, ¶2, ln5

We are then much rather interested in . . .

p60, ¶2, ln11

Rather, at that point we are much more interested in . . .

p85, ¶2, ln13

 . . . sense. That is, they are not facts, which . . .

 

p85, ¶2, ln13

 . . . sense. That is, they are not facts which . . .

p60, ¶2, ln17

 . . . sense; that is, they are not facts which . . . ”

p86, ¶3, ln5

 . . . genetical viewpoint which . . .  

 

p86, ¶3, ln5 

 . . . genetical viewpoint of the historian which . . .

p61, ¶2, ln4

 . . . genetic view-point which . . .

p86, ¶3, ln7

 . . . meaning of the term evolution varies . . .

 

p86, ¶3, ln7

 . . . meaning of the terms evolution, development, or becoming varies . . .

p61, ¶2, ln5

 . . . meaning of the terms “evolution”, “development”, or “becoming” vary . . .

p88, ¶4, ln4

 . . . evolutionism, by whom it was used in . . .  

 

p88, ¶4, ln4

 . . . evolutionism, which used it in . . .

p62, ¶2, ln8

[same as Rev. Ed.]

p88, ¶4, ln6

 . . . the multivocal . . .

 

p88, ¶4, ln6

 . . . the in itself multivocal . . .

p62, ¶2, ln9

[same as First Ed.]

p88, ¶5, ln4

 . . . of the natural sciences, which . . .

 

p88, ¶5, ln4

 . . . of the natural sciences which . . .

p62, ¶3, ln3

[same as Rev. Ed.]

p88, ¶6, ln3

 . . . of the natural sciences . . .

 

p88, ¶6, ln3

 . . . of the genetic natural sciences . . .

p62, ¶3, ln6

[same as Rev. Ed.]

p90, ¶3, ln12

“molding” 

 

p90, ¶3, ln12

“moulding”

p63, ¶2, ln18

[same as First Ed.]

p91, ¶1, ln5

“foundation”

Page 91 (1. 5)

“formation”

p91, ¶1, ln5 

[same as Errata]

p63, ¶3, ln4

[same as Rev. Ed.]

p92, ¶2, ln19

 . . . of human social life . . .

 

p92, ¶2, ln19

 . . . of human society . . .

p64, ¶3, ln14

[same as First Ed.]

p99, ¶3, ln4

 . . . are enclosed in small and undifferentiated  . . .

 

p99, ¶3, ln4

 . . . are enclosed in undifferentiated  . . .

p68, ¶3, ln3

[same as Rev. Ed.]

p99, ¶3, ln5

 . . . communities, such as clans and tribes, which  . . .

 

p99, ¶3, ln5

 . . . communities, which  . . .

p68, ¶3, ln4

[same as Rev. Ed.]

p100, ¶1, ln18

 . . . of the small popular . . .

 

p100, ¶1, ln18

 . . . of the popular . . .

p69, ¶1, ln18

[same as Rev. Ed.]

p101, ¶1, ln6

“community”

 

p101, ¶1, ln6

“group”

p69, ¶2, ln10

[same as Rev. Ed.]

p101, ¶3, ln6

“Leopold V. Ranke”

 

p101, ¶3, ln6

“Leopold von Ranke”

p70, ¶1, ln9

[same as Rev. Ed.]

p103, ¶2, ln16

“present” 

 

p103, ¶2, ln16

“presents”

p71, ¶1, ln12

[same as Rev. Ed.]

p103, ¶3, ln4 

 . . . of a differentiated society

 

p103, ¶3, ln4

 . . . of a society.

p71, ¶2, ln3

[same as Rev. Ed.]

p103, ¶3, ln4

“social”

 

p103, ¶3, ln4

“societal”

p71, ¶2, ln3

[same as Rev. Ed.]

p106, ¶3, ln8

“horizons”

Page 106 (1. 26)

“horizon”

p106, ¶3, ln8 

[same as Errata]

p72, ¶3, ln13

[same as Rev. Ed.]

p107, ¶2, ln4

Kulturekreslehre

Page 107 (1. 17)

Kulturkreislehre

p107, ¶2, ln4 

[same as Errata]

p73, ¶2, ln3

[same as Rev. Ed.]

p107, ¶2, ln11

“Frobensius”

Page 107 (1. 24)

“Frobenius”

p107, ¶2, ln11

[same as Errata]

p73, ¶2, ln9

[same as Rev. Ed.]

p115, ¶2, ln13

 . . . even to . . . . 

 

p115, ¶2, ln13

 . . . even allowed to . . .

p81, ¶1, ln9

[same as Rev. Ed.]

p122, ¶2, ln15

 . . .  a moral and a pistical pertaining to faith aspect  . . .  

 

p122, ¶2, ln15

 . . . a moral and a faith aspect  . . .

p85, ¶1, ln15

[same as Rev. Ed.]

p126, ¶2, ln13

 . . . dissociating them in an . . .  

 

p126, ¶2, ln13

 . . . dissociating the elements of their modal structure in an . . .

p87, ¶2, ln15

[same as Rev. Ed.]

p127, ¶2, ln29

 . . . for instance, presents itself to our experience  . . .

 

p127, ¶2, ln29

 . . . for instance, in case of adequate temperature conditions presents itself to our experience  . . .

p88, ¶1, ln15

. . . for instance (in case of adequate temperature conditions), presents itself to our experience  . . .

p127, ¶2, ln29

 . . . as a liquid matter . . .

 

 

p127, ¶2, ln19

 . . . as a colorless liquid matter . . .

p88, ¶1, ln16

[same as Rev. Ed.]

p128, ¶1, ln1

 . . . qualified by its physico-chemical qualities.

 

p128, ¶1, ln2

 . . . qualified by its physico-chemical properties.

 

p88, ¶1, ln17

[same as Rev. Ed.]

p128, ¶1, ln2

 . . . in the biotic aspect, . . .

 

 

p128, ¶1, ln3

 . . . in the biotic aspect . . .

 

p88, ¶1, ln18

[same as Rev. Ed.]

p129, ¶2, ln5

Can Christian theology as such provide . . .

 

p129, ¶2, ln5

Can Christian dogmatic theology as such provide . . .

p89, ¶2, ln4

[same as Rev. Ed.]

p129, ¶2, ln9

 . . . identical with Christian philosophy . . .

 

p129, ¶2, ln9

 . . . identical wth [typo] Christian philosophy . . .

p89, ¶2, ln7

 . . . identical to Christian philosophy . . .

p138, ¶3, ln1

 . . . consider from the very beginning . . .

 

p138, ¶3, ln1

 . . . consider that from the very beginning . . .

p95, ¶3, ln1

[same as Rev. Ed.]

p138, ¶3, ln2

 . . . in all the works of his hands.

 

p138, ¶3, ln2

 . . . in all the works of his hands was not accessible to a would-be autonomous human understanding.

p95, ¶3, ln2

 . . . in all the works of his hands was not open to a would-be autonomous human understanding.

p140, ¶2, ln8

 . . . scholastic theology . . .

 

p140, ¶2, ln8

 . . . traditional scholastic theology . . .

p97, ¶1, ln6

[same as Rev. Ed.]

p152, ¶1, ln13

Nevertheless, the theological meaning of these concepts . . .

 

p152, ¶1, ln13

The true theological meaning of all such analogical concepts . . .

p104, ¶3, ln14

Nevertheless, the theological meaning of all these [analogical] . . .

p152, ¶2, ln1

And this is the reason that theology  . . .

 

p152, ¶2, ln1

This is the reason why theology  . . .

p104, ¶4, ln1

[same as Rev. Ed.]

p152, ¶2, ln13

“apostatic”

 

p152, ¶2, ln13

“apostatical”

p104, ¶4, ln10

“apostate”

p165, ¶2, ln13

 . . . into polarly-opposed directions . . .

 

p165, ¶2, ln13

 . . . into polarly opposed directions . . .

p112, ¶2, ln9

[same as Rev. Ed.]

p167, ¶1, ln9

anangké

 

p167, ¶1, ln9

anangkē

p113, ¶1, ln6

anangke

p167, ¶3, ln11

 . . . of form, and he conceived the eternal forms of being as eidē, or idea.

 

p167, ¶3, ln11

 . . . of form, and he conceived the eternal forms of being as eide [sic], or ideas, respectively.

p113, ¶2, ln8-9

 . . . of form.  He conceived the eternal forms of being as eide [sic], or ideas.

p174, ¶3, ln13

 “fahion”

 

p174, ¶3, ln13

 “fashion”

p120, ¶2, ln11

[same as Rev. Ed.]

p175, ¶2, ln14

 . . . has to a great extent,  . . .

 

p175, ¶2, ln14

 . . . has to a great extent  . . .

p121, ¶1, ln2

[same as Rev. Ed.]

p178, ¶2, ln6

 . . . traditional, theological view . . .

 

p178, ¶2, ln6

 . . . traditional theological view . . .

p122, ¶3, ln5

[same as Rev. Ed.]

p179, ¶3, ln11

“history”

 

p179, ¶3, ln11

“historiography”